ExhibitComplete the following BGP configuration on CK5 so that it will remove the 65001 private AS number before it sends the 13.5.0.0/16 update to AS 200.Hostname CK5!!Output omitted!router bgp 300neighbor 3.3.3.3 remote-as 300neighbor 4.4.4.4 remote-as 300neighbor 6.6.6.6 remote-as 300———————————————
what is the most likely problem that causes the two IBGP routes NOT to be selected as the best route in the BGP table?
What is the proper configuration on Certkiller 2 to support a single BGP session between Certkiller 2 and Certkiller 3 and to enable load sharing across the two links?
What is the correct BGP configuration on CK1 and CK2 to have AS 65102 prefer the path to CK1 over the path to CK2 to reach AS 65001?
What the correct BGP configuration on Certkiller 3 and Certkiller 2 to have AS 65102 prefer the path to AS 65101 over the path to AS 65103?