Does this meet the goal?

You have an In-Place Hold that was implemented by running the following command:
New-MailboxSearch –Name “Hold-ProjectX” –SourceMailboxes “User1”.
You are notified that the In-Place Hold is no longer required.
You need to ensure that the mailbox data can be deleted by using retention policies.
Solution: You run the Set-Mailbox “User1” -LitigationHoldEnabled $false cmdlet.
Does this meet the goal?

You have an In-Place Hold that was implemented by running the following command:
New-MailboxSearch –Name “Hold-ProjectX” –SourceMailboxes “User1”.
You are notified that the In-Place Hold is no longer required.
You need to ensure that the mailbox data can be deleted by using retention policies.
Solution: You run the Set-Mailbox “User1” -LitigationHoldEnabled $false cmdlet.
Does this meet the goal?

A.
Yes

B.
No

Explanation:

The question states that the In-Place Hold is no longer required. There is no mention of Litigation Hold.
Therefore, this command will not meet the goal.
References: https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb123981(v=exchg.160).aspx



Leave a Reply 0

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *