Your company has an Exchange Server 2016 organization named contoso.com. You need to recommend a
solution that meets following requirements:
A user named Userl must be able to send email messages by using an alias [email protected] the From
field.
Recipients of the messages must be prevented from the identifying the actual sender of the message.
Userl and a user named User2 must each receive a copy of replies [email protected]
What should you recommend?
A.
Create a distribution group named Sales that has an alias of Sales. Add User1 and User2 to the group.
Assign the Send As permissions to User1.
B.
Create a shared mailbox named Sales that has an Alias of Sales. Assign the Receive As permission User1
and User2. Assign the Send As permission to User 1
C.
Create a shared mailbox named Sales that has an Alias of Sales. Assign the Receive As permission User1
and User2. Assign the Send on permission to User 1
D.
Create a distribution group named Sales that has an alias of Sales. Add User1 and User2 to the group.
Assign the send on Behalf permission to User1.
Correct answer is D.
Assigning “SEND AS” permissions would break the rule “Recipients of the messages must be prevented from the identifying the actual sender of the message”
Instead assigning “SEND ON BEHALF” permissions would mean the message is dispalyed as being sent from “sales@”
@Gareth Robson, you are wrong.
“Send on behalf” means, that the recipient gets displayed as sender “User1 on behalf of Sales”.
To prevent the recipient from identifying the real sender, the option “Send as” ist correct, because this means User1 sends as Sales.
I agree, Sirko is correct. The goal is to hide the real sender (must be prevented from identifying) (User1) when sending AS the alias address. So A should be the correct answer. The same goes when you add both SEND AS and SEND ON BEHALF permissions – SEND AS overwrites the other cos it’s the strongest one.