Which rule types should you configure on each side of the federated trust?

DRAG DROP

Your network contains two Active Directory forests named contoso.com and adatum.com. All
domain controllers run Windows Server 2012 R2.
A federated trust exists between adatum.com and contoso.com. The trust provides
adatum.com users with access to contoso.com resources.
You need to configure Active Directory Federation Services (AD FS) claim rules for the
federated trust.
The solution must meet the following requirements:
In contoso.com, replace an incoming claim type named Group with an outgoing claim type
named Role.
In adatum.com, allow users to receive their tokens for the relying party by using their Active
Directory group membership as the claim type.
The AD FS claim rules must use predefined templates.
Which rule types should you configure on each side of the federated trust?
To answer, drag the appropriate rule types to the correct location or locations. Each rule type
may be used once, more than once, or not at all. You may need to drag the split bar
between panes or scroll to view content.

DRAG DROP

Your network contains two Active Directory forests named contoso.com and adatum.com. All
domain controllers run Windows Server 2012 R2.
A federated trust exists between adatum.com and contoso.com. The trust provides
adatum.com users with access to contoso.com resources.
You need to configure Active Directory Federation Services (AD FS) claim rules for the
federated trust.
The solution must meet the following requirements:
In contoso.com, replace an incoming claim type named Group with an outgoing claim type
named Role.
In adatum.com, allow users to receive their tokens for the relying party by using their Active
Directory group membership as the claim type.
The AD FS claim rules must use predefined templates.
Which rule types should you configure on each side of the federated trust?
To answer, drag the appropriate rule types to the correct location or locations. Each rule type
may be used once, more than once, or not at all. You may need to drag the split bar
between panes or scroll to view content.

Answer:

Explanation:
http://technet.microsoft.com/zh-cn/library/ee913586(v=WS.10).aspx



Leave a Reply 15

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Joe

Joe

The 2 domains do not matter in this example, you just need to know that the claims provider trust is set on the relying party and the relying party trust is set on the claims provider.
The relying party ‘accepts’ connections from the claims provider. The only rule that the claims provider trusts can be given is the acceptance transform rule (this is the only one that can be configured for the claims provider trust)
The claims provider tells users that they are authorized to connect to the relying party, therefore the relying party trust uses the issuance authorization rule (it issues the authorization to the users)

snfonseka

snfonseka

Thanks.

oddly

oddly

The answer is wrong, i am 80 percent sure

helpful

helpful

thanks cunt <3

social apps

social apps

below youll uncover the link to some web sites that we assume you must visit

create app

create app

Here is a great Blog You may Discover Intriguing that we Encourage You

Google

Google

Although internet websites we backlink to beneath are considerably not associated to ours, we feel they’re in fact worth a go via, so have a look.

doktor

doktor

that could be the end of this report. Here youll come across some internet sites that we assume you will appreciate, just click the hyperlinks over

Fenster und Turen

Fenster und Turen

we like to honor quite a few other world-wide-web websites around the net, even when they arent linked to us, by linking to them. Under are some webpages really worth checking out

e-mentoring

e-mentoring

Every the moment in a while we choose blogs that we study. Listed beneath would be the latest web pages that we pick out

Mens Divorce Law Firm

Mens Divorce Law Firm

just beneath, are a lot of completely not associated websites to ours, on the other hand, they’re surely really worth going over

Mens Divorce Law Firm

Mens Divorce Law Firm

just beneath, are numerous entirely not connected websites to ours, however, they are surely worth going over

satta matka

satta matka

just beneath, are various absolutely not related web sites to ours, nonetheless, they are certainly really worth going over

Poloshirts Druck

Poloshirts Druck

always a large fan of linking to bloggers that I adore but do not get a great deal of link appreciate from