Your company has a main office and a branch office. The main office contains 2,000 users.
The branch office contains 800 users. Each office contains three IP subnets.
The company plans to deploy an Active Directory forest.
You need to recommend an Active Directory infrastructure to meet the following
requirements:
Ensure that the users are authenticated by using a domain controller in their respective
office.
Minimize the amount of Active Directory replication traffic between the offices.
Which Active Directory infrastructure should you recommend?
More than one answer choice may achieve the goal. Select the BEST answer.
A.
Two domains and one site
B.
Two domains and two sites
C.
One domain and two sites
D.
One domain and six sites
Explanation:
To minimize the amount of replication traffic, create 2 sites.
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb742457.aspx
I think this should be C. One domain and two sites.
That does not minimize replication traffic. One domain and one site for each location would accomplish this and the other requirement, so B is correct.
Agree with movieman.
Agree with Billy
One domain 2 sites and the requirement to authenticate the user in their own site will mean there is a DC in each site (From the same domain) and this will incur all the replication traffic associated with that design.
2 domains 2 sites covers the local authentication requirements by having a local DC for your domain in site 1 and a local DC for the other domain in site 2
Replication traffic is minimised as certain partitions are domain specific and will not need to replicate across the link and also the GC for each domain will only replicate the PAS between sites and not the entire GC
So to me the answer is B
Two domains and two sites is the correct answer
It is the probably the correct answer but why would anyone ever recommend this? Fire a single user and buy a bigger pipe. F Mircosoft and their stupid questions.
Agree with Billy too. Single domain with 2 sites. There’s no reason to create a second domain. Single forest single domain is always the best design if there are no segregation requirements.
Create 2 sites, add the 3 subnets to the respective sites and this will ensure authentication on the DC at the respective site. Control the replication time in the site settings and that’s it.
Creating another domain adds phantom information to the replication and adds more PAS overhead to your GC’s for no reason.
this is stupid, i can see how both answers are right, how can MSFT really think this is a good question.
If someone actually things about in the real world, of course you would only do 1 domain, how much replication traffic would there be 10 meg a day, MAYBE
but if you think about satisfying the question 2 domains would further minimize the traffic.
stupid stupid stupid
Im going 2 domains because its a test question
Wonderful story, reckoned we could combine a handful of unrelated data, nevertheless actually worth taking a look, whoa did one master about Mid East has got much more problerms at the same time.
one of our visitors lately recommended the following website
one of our visitors lately suggested the following website
one of our visitors not too long ago proposed the following website
the time to read or visit the material or websites we have linked to beneath the
The info talked about within the report are some of the ideal available
very couple of sites that happen to be detailed beneath, from our point of view are undoubtedly nicely really worth checking out
Wonderful story, reckoned we could combine some unrelated data, nevertheless genuinely worth taking a appear, whoa did one learn about Mid East has got a lot more problerms also
we came across a cool website that you just may possibly love. Take a look should you want
Wonderful story, reckoned we could combine several unrelated data, nonetheless really worth taking a appear, whoa did a single master about Mid East has got a lot more problerms also