Which approach should you recommend?

You are designing a custom SharePoint 2010 solution package. It will include a feature that
contains a Web Part, which requires a custom assembly for its functionality. You need to
design the feature based on the following requirements: ·The Web Part must be a partial
trust application and support a custom Code Access Security (CAS) policy. .The solution
package must be deployed without the need of farm-level administrator permissions. Which
approach should you recommend?

You are designing a custom SharePoint 2010 solution package. It will include a feature that
contains a Web Part, which requires a custom assembly for its functionality. You need to
design the feature based on the following requirements: ·The Web Part must be a partial
trust application and support a custom Code Access Security (CAS) policy. .The solution
package must be deployed without the need of farm-level administrator permissions. Which
approach should you recommend?

A.
Create the Web Part feature as a sandboxed solution.

B.
Create an assembly with a strong name and deploy it to the global assembly cache at the
farm level. Activate the feature at the site collection level with delegated administration.

C.
Create the Web Part feature assembly with a strong name and deploy it using a .wsp file
to the _app_bin directory of all Web applications where it is needed. Then activate it using
delegated administration.

D.
Create the Web Part feature and deploy the required assembly to the bin directory of
only the Web applications that require it. Then delegate administration to the site
administrator. Lastly, create a custom CAS policy file and point to it the web.config file of the
application.



Leave a Reply 0

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *