Which approach should you recommend?

You are designing an application configuration approach for a custom SharePoint 2010
application. You need to design the application configuration to: ·Store and secure custom
configuration settings for the application including connection strings, server names, file
paths, and other miscellaneous settings. .Read and display the settings on the site with an
administrative user interface that can be configured using a custom _layouts page. .Store
configuration settings at the farm, Web application, site collection, and site levels as
needed. You need to design a storage option that is simple and lightweight in structure and
programmatically configurable. Which approach should you recommend?

You are designing an application configuration approach for a custom SharePoint 2010
application. You need to design the application configuration to: ·Store and secure custom
configuration settings for the application including connection strings, server names, file
paths, and other miscellaneous settings. .Read and display the settings on the site with an
administrative user interface that can be configured using a custom _layouts page. .Store
configuration settings at the farm, Web application, site collection, and site levels as
needed. You need to design a storage option that is simple and lightweight in structure and
programmatically configurable. Which approach should you recommend?

A.
Add custom configuration settings to the web.config file and programmatically read this
file to display the custom settings.

B.
Use SharePoint lists to store the custom configuration settings.

C.
Use a hierarchical object store to save the custom configuration settings and
programmatically read it to display the custom settings.

D.
Use a property bag to store the custom configuration settings.



Leave a Reply 0

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *