Which approach should you recommend?

You are designing a SharePoint 2010 workflow that will be used to monitor invoices. The

workflow has the following requirements: ·Invoices may have a status of Submitted,
Reviewed, Rejected, Returned for Revision, or Approved. .Not every status applies to every
invoice. You need to design the workflow to monitor the status of the invoices as they are
processed. Which approach should you recommend?

You are designing a SharePoint 2010 workflow that will be used to monitor invoices. The

workflow has the following requirements: ·Invoices may have a status of Submitted,
Reviewed, Rejected, Returned for Revision, or Approved. .Not every status applies to every
invoice. You need to design the workflow to monitor the status of the invoices as they are
processed. Which approach should you recommend?

A.
Use Visual Studio 2010 to create a state machine workflow.

B.
Use SharePoint Designer 2010 to create a reusable declarative workflow.

C.
Use Visio 2010 to create the workflow. Select the Set Workflow Status shape and
configure it to execute when the status of an invoice changes.

D.
Use Visio 2010 to create the workflow. Before each status action, add a Start shape to
initiate the workflow action.



Leave a Reply 0

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *