Which approach should you recommend?

You are designing multiple SharePoint 2010 features. You have the following requirements:
There must be three features, named Feature_1, Feature_2, and Feature_3.
.Feature_1 must be dependent on Feature_2; Feature_2 must be dependent on Feature_3.
.Feature_1 must be available to a site collection named Finance.
You need to ensure that your feature design meets these requirements and follows the SharePoint Feature Activation Dependency Rules.
Which approach should you recommend?

You are designing multiple SharePoint 2010 features. You have the following requirements:
There must be three features, named Feature_1, Feature_2, and Feature_3.
.Feature_1 must be dependent on Feature_2; Feature_2 must be dependent on Feature_3.
.Feature_1 must be available to a site collection named Finance.
You need to ensure that your feature design meets these requirements and follows the SharePoint Feature Activation Dependency Rules.
Which approach should you recommend?

A.
Design Feature_1 and Feature_2 as visible; design Feature_3 as a hidden feature.
Set the scopes for Feature_1, Feature_2, and Feature_3 to Site.

B.
Design Feature_1 and Feature_2 as visible; design Feature_3 as a hidden feature.
Set the scopes for Feature_1 and Feature_2 to Site.
Set the scope for Feature_3 to Web.

C.
Design Feature_1 and Feature_2 as visible; design Feature_3 as a hidden feature.
Set the scope for Feature_1 to Web Application.
Set the scopes for Feature_2 and Feature_3 to Web.

D.
Design Feature_1, Feature_2, and Feature_3 as visible features.
Set the scopes for Feature_1 and Feature_2 to Site.
Set the scope for Feature_3 to Web.



Leave a Reply 1

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Haze

Haze

Feature 1 is scope site : “Feature_1 must be available to a site collection named Finance.”

Feature 1 dependent Feature 2, so scope of Feature 2 is Site.
Feature 3 dependant Feature 2, so scope of Feature 3 is Site too.