Which approach should you recommend?

You are designing a solution package for an application project, which has several types of SharePoint 2010
artifacts. Your project contains a Web Part, features, list definitions, assemblies, customized ASPX pages, and workflows.
You have the following requirements:
You must ensure the security and manageability of the SharePoint applications.
.SharePoint administrators must enforce quota limits on resources consumed. Based on your analysis, the
Web Part will exceed the limit.
.You must deploy all of the artifacts with the fewest solutions possible.
You need to create a deployment plan that meets these requirements.
Which approach should you recommend?

You are designing a solution package for an application project, which has several types of SharePoint 2010
artifacts. Your project contains a Web Part, features, list definitions, assemblies, customized ASPX pages, and workflows.
You have the following requirements:
You must ensure the security and manageability of the SharePoint applications.
.SharePoint administrators must enforce quota limits on resources consumed. Based on your analysis, the
Web Part will exceed the limit.
.You must deploy all of the artifacts with the fewest solutions possible.
You need to create a deployment plan that meets these requirements.
Which approach should you recommend?

A.
Create one solution package that contains all of the artifacts in the development project.

B.
Create two solution packages:
.A farm-scoped solution that contains the Web Part
.A solution that contains all the remaining artifacts in the project

C.
Create two solution packages:
.A sandboxed solution containing the Web Part
.A solution that contains all the remaining artifacts in the project

D.
Create three solution packages:
.A solution for list definitions
.A solution containing the Web Part and its related assemblies
.A solution for customized ASPX pages and workflows



Leave a Reply 0

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *