what is the reason that interface FastEthernet 0/10 is not the root port for VLAN 2?

Refer to the exhibit.

Given the output shown from this Cisco Catalyst 2950, what is the reason that interface
FastEthernet 0/10 is not the root port for VLAN 2?

Refer to the exhibit.

Given the output shown from this Cisco Catalyst 2950, what is the reason that interface
FastEthernet 0/10 is not the root port for VLAN 2?

A.
This switch has more than one interface connected to the root network segment in VLAN 2.

B.
This switch is running RSTP while the elected designated switch is running 802.1d Spanning
Tree.

C.
This switch interface has a higher path cost to the root bridge than another in the topology.

D.
This switch has a lower bridge ID for VLAN 2 than the elected designated switch.



Leave a Reply 6

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Dave Chappel

Dave Chappel

This is wrong – the only time you will see a port as ALTN is when it is an alternate path to the root. As there is no information given as to the cost (media types) of any ports then we must assume that a port number lower than 10 is also connected to the Root. That makes the answer A.

Dave Chappel

Dave Chappel

unless someone else can prove me wrong otherwise

Eddy

Eddy

If A was the correct the role would be backup not alternate

jay z

jay z

you are correct.

POTA POV

POTA POV

Took my 200-101 exam few days ago and passed with 1000/1000 points! 3-5 new questions, 3 Simulations (OSPF, EIGRP and Frame Relay). Exam is not difficult and I learned all questions from valid 200-101 dumps on http://www.passleader.com/200-101.html (295 Q&As). Good Luck!

Vinh nyuen

Vinh nyuen

Altn – cost