What would be the effect of Issuing the command ip access-group 115 in on the s0/0/1 interface?
No host could connect to RouterC through s0/0/1.
A.
Telnet and ping would work but routing updates would fail.
B.
FTP, FTP-DATA, echo, and www would work but telnet would fail.
C.
Only traffic from the 10.4.4.0 network would pass through the interface.
Explanation:
First let’s see what was configured on interface S0/0/1:
Recall that each interface only accepts one access-list, so when using the command “ip access-group 115 in” on the s0/0/1 interface it will overwrite the initial access-list 102. Therefore any telnet connection will be accepted (so we can eliminate answer C).
B is not correct because if telnet and ping can work then routing updates can, too.
D is not correct because access-list 115 does not mention about 10.4.4.0 network. So the most reasonable answer is A.
But here raise a question…
The wildcard mask of access-list 115, which is 255.255.255.0, means that only host with ip addresses in the form of x.x.x.0 will be accepted. But we all know that x.x.x.0 is likely to be a network address so the answer A: “no host could connect to Router through s0/0/1” seems right…
The choices are wrongly ordered. It should be like this:
A. No host could connect to RouterC through s0/0/1.
B. Telnet and ping would work but routing updates would fail.
C. FTP, FTP-DATA, echo, and www would work but telnet would fail.
D. Only traffic from the 10.4.4.0 network would pass through the interface.
And the answer is A.