Which of the following tools would be most appropriate?

An enterprise has plans to start adding IPv6 support. The initial deployment requires support
from some IPv6-only devices that need to access servers that support only IPv4. Which of
the following tools would be most appropriate?

An enterprise has plans to start adding IPv6 support. The initial deployment requires support
from some IPv6-only devices that need to access servers that support only IPv4. Which of
the following tools would be most appropriate?

A.
Native IPv6

B.
Point-to-point tunnels

C.
Multipoint tunnels

D.
NAT-PT

Explanation:

Native IPv6 makes the most sense when the IPv6 deployment is pervasive, with traffic loads
heavy or at least steady.. Point-to-point tunnels work best when IPv6 is needed in only a
subset of sites, but also when the traffic should be somewhat regular or with higher volumE.
Multipoint tunnels also work well when IPv6 is needed in a subset of sites, but it is more
appropriate when the traffic is more occasional and lower volumE. Finally, NAT-PT is useful
when an IPv4-only host needs to communicate with an IPv6-only host.



Leave a Reply 0

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *