Which of the following could you do so that the routers can share redistributed routes?
(Select 2 choices.)
A.
Change the EIGRP router ID by issuing the eigrp router-id 1.2.3.4 command on either
router.
B.
Change the loopback1 IP address by issuing the ip address 1.2.3.4 255.255.255.255
command for the loopback1 interface on either router.
C.
Change the secondary IP address by issuing the ip address 172.16.2.2 255.255.255.0
secondary command for the Fa0/1 interface on RouterB.
D.
Change the loopback0 IP address by issuing the ip address 1.2.3.4 255.255.255.255
command for the loopback0 interface on either router.
E.
Create a different EIGRP AS by issuing the router eigrp 2 command on either router.
two routers with the same loopback address?
two routers with the same eigrp router-id?
I call this one out…this question’s wording is SO “off”
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/ip/enhanced-interior-gateway-routing-protocol-eigrp/18685-eigrp-dup-id.html
“Duplicate Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol (EIGRP) router IDs can cause problems with the redistribution of EIGRP external routes. This document explains the problem and provides the proper configuration to prevent it”
now if the question read : “there’s a problem and redistributed routes are not getting propogated to neighbors…what is the problem?” then A & B make PERFECT sense.
is this a REAL ccnp question?
am I missing the point of it somehow…someone please point me to the correct doc to understand what this question is really about.
–