what would be the status of each path to 172.30.1.0/24?

On the basis of the exhibit provided, assuming that EIGRP is the routing protocol, then at R5, what would be the status of each path to 172.30.1.0/24?

On the basis of the exhibit provided, assuming that EIGRP is the routing protocol, then at R5, what would be the status of each path to 172.30.1.0/24?

A.
the path through PG-R3 would be the successor, the path through PG-R1 would be a feasible successor, and the path through PG-R4 would be neither a successor nor a feasible successor

B.
not enough information has been given to figure out what the status of each route would be

C.
the path through PG-R3 would be the successor, and the paths through PG-R1 and PG-R4 would be feasible successors

D.
the path through PG-R1 would be the successor, the path through PG-R3 would be a feasible successor, and the path through PG-R4 would be neither a successor nor feasible successor

Explanation:
EIGRP – bandwidth and Delay metrics by default



Leave a Reply 0

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *