The network administrator has been asked to give reasons for moving from IPv4 to IPv6. What are two valid reasons for adopting IPv6 over IPv4? (Choose two.)
A.
no broadcast
B.
change of source address in the IPv6 header
C.
change of destination address in the IPv6 header
D.
Telnet access does not require a password
E.
autoconfiguration
F.
NAT
There are 3 ways to implement IPv6: Dual-stack, Tunneling, or translation.
E. is correct because which means that a dedicated DHCP server is not need.
A. IPv6 does not broadcast. Instead it multicasts.
Why NAT should not be one of the answers?
IPv6 definitely removes the need for NAT/PAT!! I think F should be one of the correct options.
I DONT AGREE WITH ONE OF THIS ANSWERS, I CAN SAY THE SAMETHING ABOUT BRODCAST/NAT BECAUSE IT WONT BE USEFUL ANYMORE
I THINK JUST TO ELIMINATE NAT WITH IPV6 WAS A SUCESS
NAT WAS CREATED BECAUSE IT WAS NOT ENOUGH IPV4 THE PROBLEM IT SOLVE WITH IPV6 AND NOT IS NOT NEEDED OR USE THIS IS A GOOD REASON