0/8 prefix?

CK4 >show ip bgp 172.0.0.0
BGP routing table entry for 172.0.0.0/8, version 4 Paths: (1 available, best #1, table Default-IP-Routing-Table) Advertised to non peer-group peers:
192.168.1.6
50111
2.2.2.2 (metric 2323456) from 3.3.3.3 (3.3.3.3)
Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, internal, best Originator: 2.2.2.2, Cluster list: 3.3.3.3
Based on the shown ip bgp 172.0.0.0 output shown, which statement is true about the 172.0.0.0/8 prefix?

CK4 >show ip bgp 172.0.0.0
BGP routing table entry for 172.0.0.0/8, version 4 Paths: (1 available, best #1, table Default-IP-Routing-Table) Advertised to non peer-group peers:
192.168.1.6
50111
2.2.2.2 (metric 2323456) from 3.3.3.3 (3.3.3.3)
Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, internal, best Originator: 2.2.2.2, Cluster list: 3.3.3.3
Based on the shown ip bgp 172.0.0.0 output shown, which statement is true about the 172.0.0.0/8 prefix?

A.
It is received from an EBGP neighbor.

B.
It is received from an intra-confederation EBGP neighbor.

C.
It is received from an intra-confederation IBGP neighbor.

D.
It is a prefix locally originated by CK4 .

E.
It is received from a route reflector.



Leave a Reply 0

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *