What is one of the reasons that custom QoS ACLs are recommended over automatic QoS when configuring ports on a Catalyst 6500 for use with IP phones?

What is one of the reasons that custom QoS ACLs are recommended over automatic QoS when configuring ports on a Catalyst 6500 for use with IP phones?

What is one of the reasons that custom QoS ACLs are recommended over automatic QoS when configuring ports on a Catalyst 6500 for use with IP phones?

A.
79xx IP phones do not automatically mark voice packets with non-zero DSCP values.

B.
79xx IP phones do not mark protocol packets such as DHCP, DNS, or TFTP with non-zero DSCP values.

C.
79xx IP phones do not mark voice packets with optimal DSCP values.

D.
79xx IP phones use a custom protocol to communicate CDP information to the switch.

Explanation:



Leave a Reply 2

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


mguerrerop

mguerrerop

In another group of dumps that is supposed to have correct answers, the answer to this question is: 79xx IP phones do not mark protocol packets such as DHCP, DNS, or TFTP with non-zero DSCP values.

Can someone verify or comment?

George

George

I agree and it makes more sense , if you have a pc behind the phone you need to mark the traffic