Refer to the exhibit.
Given the partial BGP configuration, which configuration correctly completes the Cisco IOS-XR
route reflector configuration where both the 1.1.1.1 and 2.2.2.2 routers are the clients and the
3.3.3.3 router is a non-client IBGP peer?
A.
neighbor 1.1.1.1
remote-as 65123
route-reflector-client
neighbor 2.2.2.2
remote-as 65123
route-reflector-client
neighbor 3.3.3.3
remote-as 65123
B.
neighbor 1.1.1.1
address-family ipv4 unicast
remote-as 65123
route-reflector-client
neighbor 2.2.2.2
address-family ipv4 unicast
remote-as 65123
route-reflector-client
neighbor 3.3.3.3
address-family ipv4 unicast
remote-as 65123
C.
neighbor 1.1.1.1
remote-as 65123
address-family ipv4 unicast
route-reflector-client
neighbor 2.2.2.2
remote-as 65123
address-family ipv4 unicast
route-reflector-client
neighbor 3.3.3.3
remote-as 65123
D.
neighbor 1.1.1.1 remote-as 65123
neighbor 1.1.1.1 route-reflector-client
neighbor 2.2.2.2 remote-as 65123
neighbor 2.2.2.2 route-reflector-client
neighbor 3.3.3.3 remote-as 65123
In answer C, shouldn’t neighbor 3.3.3.3 have address-family ipv4 unicast?
It cuts off before adding the address-family ipv4 unicast command.