which two statements are correct regarding behavior of the "IIq" policy-map?

Scenario:

After reviewing present router configuration CE7 .which two statements are correct regarding
behavior of the “IIq” policy-map? (Choose 2)

Scenario:

After reviewing present router configuration CE7 .which two statements are correct regarding
behavior of the “IIq” policy-map? (Choose 2)

A.
Traffic matched by the “cisco1” class-map will be assigned to the priority queue.

B.
The “IIq” QoS policy is applied to the gi0/0 interface in the output direction

C.
Traffic matched bythe”cisco2″ class-map has a maximum bandwidth of 30%D. Traffic matched bythe”cisco3″ class-map has no priority and has a minimum bandwidth guarantee
of 20%

E.
There are no packets being matched by the “class-default” traffic class in the “IIq” policy

Explanation:
You will notice that “cisco1” class map is assigned to the priority queue (the
command is configured under policy-map IIq class cisco1 priority xxx)
“cisco2” class map: is indeed configured using bandwidth 30%, however that
defines the minimum bandwidth but not the maximum.
“cisco3” class map: is indeed configured using “bandwidth 20%”, No priority
configured and that will define the minimum guaranteed bandwidth.
The last choice is wrong! check under “show policy-map interface” There are 4 or
more packets being matched by the “class-default” traffic class in the “IIq” policy.
Class-map: class-default (match-any)
4 packets, 968 bytes



Leave a Reply 0

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *