what is one reason why no routes from the OSPF neighbor 192.168.0.5 are installed in the IP routing table?

Refer to the exhibit.

Based on the command output, what is one reason why no routes from the OSPF neighbor
192.168.0.5 are installed in the IP routing table?

Refer to the exhibit.

Based on the command output, what is one reason why no routes from the OSPF neighbor
192.168.0.5 are installed in the IP routing table?

A.
R3 will only install routes from the neighbor with the lowest priority (Pri). If routes have the
same priority, routes from the neighbor with the lowest IP address are used.

B.
R3 did not receive any LSAs from 192.168.0.5.

C.
Routes from backup designated routers are never installed in the IP routing table.

D.
192.168.0.5 is a redundant link to 192.168.0.4, and load balancing is not enabled.

Explanation:
R3 may not receive any LSAs from neighbor 192.168.0.5 because a distribute-list blocks it. But
notice that the LSAs are not filtered out in the LSDB since all routers in an OSPF area must be the
same (synchronized).



Leave a Reply 0

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *