Which would be the first logical step to take?

Refer to the exhibit. Based upon the configuration, you need to understand why the policy routing match counts are not increasing.
Which would be the first logical step to take?
Select the best response.

Refer to the exhibit. Based upon the configuration, you need to understand why the policy routing match counts are not increasing.
Which would be the first logical step to take?
Select the best response.

A.
Confirm if there are other problematic route-map statements that precede divert.

B.
Check the access list for log hits.

C.
Check the routing table for 212.50.185.126.

D.
Remove any two of the set clauses. (Multiple set clause entries will cause PBR to use the routing table.)



Leave a Reply 1

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Charles

Charles

Answer: B

Explanation

First we should check the access-list log, if the hit count does not increase then no packets are matched the access-list -> the policy based routing match counts will not increase.