Which action will accomplish this goal?

Refer to the exhibit. ROUTE Enterprises has many stub networks in their enterprise network, such as router B and its associated network. EIGRP is to be implemented on router A so that neither the prefix for the S/0/0/0 interface nor the prefixes from router B appear in the routing tables for the router in the enterprise network.
Which action will accomplish this goal?

Select the best response.

Refer to the exhibit. ROUTE Enterprises has many stub networks in their enterprise network, such as router B and its associated network. EIGRP is to be implemented on router A so that neither the prefix for the S/0/0/0 interface nor the prefixes from router B appear in the routing tables for the router in the enterprise network.
Which action will accomplish this goal?

Select the best response.

A.
Declare router B a stub router using the eigrp stub command.

B.
Use the passive-interface command for interface Serial0/0/0.

C.
Use a mask with the network command to exclude interface Serial0/0/0.

D.
Implement a distribute list to exclude the link prefix from the routing updates.



Leave a Reply 3

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Mustafa

Mustafa

Why not D

Charles

Charles

Answer: C

Explanation

If we declare router B a stub router then the routers in Enterprise Network still learn about the network for S0/0/0 interface and the network behind router B -> A is not correct.

If we use the passive-interface command on s0/0/0 interface then router A & B can not become neighbor because they don’t exchange hello messages -> A can not send traffic to the network behind B -> B is not correct.

Theoretically, we can use a distribute list to exclude both the link prefix and the prefix from router B but it is not efficient because:

+ We have many stub networks so we will need a “long” distribute list.
+ We declare networks in stub routers (like router B) while filter them out at router A -> it is a waste.

I am not totally sure about answer C because if we “use a mask with the network command to exclude interface Serial0/0/0″ then router A and B can not become neighbors and the situation is same as answer B. But from many discussions about this question, maybe C is the best answer.

NM

NM

Just Lab It up and you will see the only answer is D; distribution-lists are used to filter routes using ACLs or Prefix-lists, you can filter the local route connected to int s0/0/0 and also the learned routes from RB, even when there are a lot of spoke routers, if ip addressing was properly designed you can filter all those routes with just one line in a prefix-list.
If you use wilcard masks to exclude int s0/0/0, Router B and router A will not become neighbors and we DO need them to be neighbors.