Which approach enables this to work?

Consider a scenario where Oracle B2B receives messages from different trading partners that
need to be placed in separate folders after processing. For example, messages received from
trading partner Marketing need to be processed and placed in a file folder called “Marketing” after
processing. Messages received from trading partner GlobalChips need to be processed and
placed in a file Folder named “GlobalChips” after processing.
Which approach enables this to work?

A.
There should be two different trading partner agreements, with each agreement using a
different host channel depending on which folder the processed file needs to be placed in.

B.
There should be two different trading partner agreements, with each agreement using a
different partner channel depending on which folder the processed file needs to be placed in.

C.
There should be one trading partner agreement, but there should be two different listening
channels depending on which folder the file needs to be placed in.

D.
This functionality cannot be achieved In Oracle B2B natively and needs to be implemented
using a Java callout.

Explanation:

Note:
* Agreements that include document definitions for restricted document types cannot be modified
or exported.
*Listening channels are used globally. You do not need to select a listening delivery channel in an
agreement. Listening channels are used for any trading partner to send inbound messages to
Oracle B2B or for any back-end business application to send outbound messages to Oracle B2B.
* Oracle B2B is an e-commerce gateway that enables the secure and reliable exchange of
business documents between an enterprise and its trading partners. Oracle B2B supports
business-to-business document standards, security, transports, messaging services, and trading
partner management. With Oracle B2B used as a binding component within an Oracle SOA Suite
composite application, end-to-end business processes can be implemented.