Which of the following would be a result of having more than one active Security Management Server in a Management High Availability (HA) configuration?

Which of the following would be a result of having more than one active Security Management
Server in a Management High Availability (HA) configuration?

Which of the following would be a result of having more than one active Security Management
Server in a Management High Availability (HA) configuration?

A.
An error notification will popup during SmartDashboard login if the two machines can
communicate indicating Collision status.

B.
The need to manually synchronize the secondary Security Management Server with the
Primary Security Management Server is eliminated.

C.
Allows for faster seamless failover: from active-to-active instead of standby-to-active.

D.
Creates a High Availability implementation between the Gateways installed on the Security
Management Servers.



Leave a Reply 3

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


rbilka

rbilka

“A”

Reason (src: https://sc1.checkpoint.com/documents/R80/CP_R80_SecMGMT/html_frameset.htm?topic=documents/R80/CP_R80_SecMGMT/120712 )

General Status messages in overview banner:
“Synchronized”: The database of the primary Security Management Server is identical with the database of the secondary.
“Some servers could not be synchronized”: A communication issue prevents synchronization, or some other synchronization issue exists.
“No HA”: The active and standby servers are not communicating.
“Communication Problem”: The fwm service is down or cannot be reached.
“Collision or HA conflict”: More than one management server configured as active. Two active servers cannot sync with each other.

Esteban

Esteban

A. An error notification will popup during SmartDashboard login if the two machines can
communicate indicating Collision status.