which two actions would solve this problem?

inet.0: 4 destinations, 4 routes (4 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden)
+ = Active Route, – = Last Active, * = Both
172.23.10.0/24 *[Direct/0] 21:59:56
>via ge-0/0/6.0
172.23.10.100/32 *[Local/0] 22:00:10
Local via ge-0/0/6.0
172.23.12.0/24 *[Static/5] 00:01:36
>to 172.23.10.1 via ge-0/0/6.0
172.23.15.0/24 *[Static/5] 00:01:36
>to 172.23.10.1 via ge-0/0/6.0

Users are unable to access resources in the 172.23.14.0/24 subnet.
Referring to the exhibit, which two actions would solve this problem? (Choose two.)

inet.0: 4 destinations, 4 routes (4 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden)
+ = Active Route, – = Last Active, * = Both
172.23.10.0/24 *[Direct/0] 21:59:56
>via ge-0/0/6.0
172.23.10.100/32 *[Local/0] 22:00:10
Local via ge-0/0/6.0
172.23.12.0/24 *[Static/5] 00:01:36
>to 172.23.10.1 via ge-0/0/6.0
172.23.15.0/24 *[Static/5] 00:01:36
>to 172.23.10.1 via ge-0/0/6.0

Users are unable to access resources in the 172.23.14.0/24 subnet.
Referring to the exhibit, which two actions would solve this problem? (Choose two.)

A.
Configure a separate routing instance.

B.
Configure a default static route.

C.
Configure a static route to 172.23.14.0/24.

D.
Configure the existing routes to resolve the indirect next hop.



Leave a Reply 0

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *