Which configuration change should be made to ensure failover to Node 1?

— Exhibit —
user@host# show chassis cluster
reth-count 2;
redundancy-group 1 {
node 0 priority 200;
node 1 priority 100;
interface-monitor {
ge-0/0/5 weight 85;
ge-0/0/6 weight 85;
ge-0/0/7 weight 85;
ge-0/0/8 weight 85;
ge-5/0/5 weight 85;
ge-5/0/6 weight 85;
ge-5/0/7 weight 85;
ge-5/0/8 weight 85;
}
}
— Exhibit —
Click the Exhibit button.
Referring to the exhibit, you have two SRX Series devices in a chassis cluster, and Node 0 is currently the
primary node. You want to ensure that traffic, using those interfaces, fails over to Node 1 when all interfaces
go down.
Which configuration change should be made to ensure failover to Node 1?

— Exhibit —
user@host# show chassis cluster
reth-count 2;
redundancy-group 1 {
node 0 priority 200;
node 1 priority 100;
interface-monitor {
ge-0/0/5 weight 85;
ge-0/0/6 weight 85;
ge-0/0/7 weight 85;
ge-0/0/8 weight 85;
ge-5/0/5 weight 85;
ge-5/0/6 weight 85;
ge-5/0/7 weight 85;
ge-5/0/8 weight 85;
}
}
— Exhibit —
Click the Exhibit button.
Referring to the exhibit, you have two SRX Series devices in a chassis cluster, and Node 0 is currently the
primary node. You want to ensure that traffic, using those interfaces, fails over to Node 1 when all interfaces
go down.
Which configuration change should be made to ensure failover to Node 1?

A.
Decrease the weight of the interfaces to 1.

B.
Increase the weight of the interfaces to 255.

C.
Increase the weight of the interfaces to between 86 and 128.

D.
Decrease the weight of the interfaces to between 64 and 84.



Leave a Reply 2

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


3abdontha3if

3abdontha3if

With weight of 64 only 4 interfaces could trigger the failover as 64*4=256>255
I think the weight should be lower than 64
if all interfaces has a weight of 32
than 32*8=256
256>255 then failover

traffikator

traffikator

32*4, not 32*8. and 32*4=128<256 <= no failover