Refer to the Exhibit.
In the exhibit, a customer wants to configure an EBGP connection to two different routers in a
neighboring autonomous system. The goal of this configuration is to use per-prefix load balancing
across both EBGP links.
Which configuration accomplishes this goal?
A.
{master:0}[edit]
Juniper@External-BGP# show protocols bgp
group External {
multihop;
peer-as 65543;
neighbor 10.10.2.2;
neighbor 10.20.2.2;
}
B.
{master:0}[edit]
Juniper@External-BGP# show protocols bgp
group External {
multipath;
peer-as 65543;
neighbor 10.10.2.2;
neighbor 10.20.2.2;
}
C.
{master:0}[edit]
Juniper@External-BGP# show protocols bgp
group External {
multihop;
local-address 192.168.2.1;
peer-as 65543;
neighbor 10.10.2.2;
neighbor 10.20.2.2;
lab@Area-0-ABR# show routing-options
static {
route 0.0.0.0 next-hop [ 10.10.2.2 10.20.2.2 ];
}
autonomous-system 65432;
D.
{master:0}[edit]
lab@Area-0-ABR# show protocols bgp
group External {
multihop;
local-address 192.168.2.1;
peer-as 65543;
multipath;
neighbor 10.10.2.2;
neighbor 10.20.2.2;
}
lab@Area-0-ABR# show routing-options
static {
route 0.0.0.0 next-hop [ 10.10.2.2 10.20.2.2 ];
}
autonomous-system 65432;
Explanation:
Yu need the exhibit in question 17 for this one
Don’t forget about:
[policy-options]
policy-statement load-balance {
then {
load-balance per-packet;
}
}
[routing-options]
forwarding-table {
export load-balance;
}