Which two statements are true about the OSPF adjacency …

Click the Exhibit button.

user@R1> show ospf interface detail
Interface State Area DR ID BDR ID Nbcs
xe-0/0/1.0 BDR 0.0.0.0 2.169.37.12 11.244.245.215 1
Type LAN, address 192.161.27.11, Mask 255.255.255.248, MTU 4460, Cost 40
DR addr 192.161.37.12, BDR addr 192.168.37.11, Adj count 1, Priority 128
Hello 10, Dead 40, ReXmit 5, Not Stub
fe-0/2/1.0 PtToPt 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
Type P2P, Address 0.0.0.0, Mask 0.0.0.0, MTU 1500, Cost 2604
Adj count 0
Hello 10, Dead 40, ReXmit 5, Not stub
Auth type: MDS, Active key ID 3, Start time 2013 Jul 19 10:00:00 PST
IPsec SA Name: sa
user@R2> show ospf interface detail
Interface State Area DR ID BDR ID Nbcs
xe-1/1/1.0 BDR 0.0.0.0 192.168.37.12 11.244.245.216 1
Type LAN, address 192.161.27.12, Mask 255.255.255.248, MTU 4460, Cost 40
DR addr 192.161.37.12, BDR addr 192.168.37.11, Adj count 1, Priority 128
Hello 3, Dead 9, ReXmit 5, Not stub
fe-2/2/2.0 PtToPt 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
Type P2P, address 0.0.0.0, Mask 0.0.0.0, MTU 1500, Cost 2604
Adj count 0
Hello 10, Dead 40, ReXmit 5, Not Stub
Auth type: MDS, Active key ID 3, Start time 2013 Jul 19 10:00:00 PST
IPsec SA Name: sa
Which two statements are true about the OSPF adjacency displayed in the exhibit? (Choose two.)

Click the Exhibit button.

user@R1> show ospf interface detail
Interface State Area DR ID BDR ID Nbcs
xe-0/0/1.0 BDR 0.0.0.0 2.169.37.12 11.244.245.215 1
Type LAN, address 192.161.27.11, Mask 255.255.255.248, MTU 4460, Cost 40
DR addr 192.161.37.12, BDR addr 192.168.37.11, Adj count 1, Priority 128
Hello 10, Dead 40, ReXmit 5, Not Stub
fe-0/2/1.0 PtToPt 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
Type P2P, Address 0.0.0.0, Mask 0.0.0.0, MTU 1500, Cost 2604
Adj count 0
Hello 10, Dead 40, ReXmit 5, Not stub
Auth type: MDS, Active key ID 3, Start time 2013 Jul 19 10:00:00 PST
IPsec SA Name: sa
user@R2> show ospf interface detail
Interface State Area DR ID BDR ID Nbcs
xe-1/1/1.0 BDR 0.0.0.0 192.168.37.12 11.244.245.216 1
Type LAN, address 192.161.27.12, Mask 255.255.255.248, MTU 4460, Cost 40
DR addr 192.161.37.12, BDR addr 192.168.37.11, Adj count 1, Priority 128
Hello 3, Dead 9, ReXmit 5, Not stub
fe-2/2/2.0 PtToPt 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
Type P2P, address 0.0.0.0, Mask 0.0.0.0, MTU 1500, Cost 2604
Adj count 0
Hello 10, Dead 40, ReXmit 5, Not Stub
Auth type: MDS, Active key ID 3, Start time 2013 Jul 19 10:00:00 PST
IPsec SA Name: sa
Which two statements are true about the OSPF adjacency displayed in the exhibit? (Choose two.)

A.
There is a mismatch in the dead interval parameter between routers R1 and R2.

B.
There is a mismatch in the hold timer parameter between routers R1 and R2.

C.
There is a mismatch in the hello interval parameter between routers R1 and R2.

D.
There is a mismatch in the poll interval parameter between routers R1 and R2.

Explanation:
If the timers are equal, which they are by default in JUNOS (for LAN/P2P the Hello = 10s and Dead = 40s), the
neighbors will establish a relationship (at least on 1 side).
There is a Hello and Dead parameter mismatch. On R1 we see:
On R1 we see:
DR addr 192.161.37.12, BDR addr 192.168.37.11, Adj count 1, Priority 128
Hello 10, Dead 40, ReXmit 5, Not Stubwhile on R2 we see:
DR addr 192.161.37.12, BDR addr 192.168.37.11, Adj count 1, Priority 128
Hello 3, Dead 9, ReXmit 5, Not stub
https://inetzero.com/what-is-your-ospf-neighbor-doing-adjancency-problems-in-ospf/



Leave a Reply 0

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *