which two OSPF adjacency problems are present?

Click the Exhibit button.
— Exhibit —
May 20 22:27:04.010297 OSPF rcvd Hello 192.168.0.2 -> 224.0.0.5 (ge-1/1/2.0 IFL 343 area
0.0.0.0)
May 20 22:27:04.010320 Version 2, length 44, ID 10.10.10.1, area 0.0.0.1
May 20 22:27:04.010342 checksum 0x166d, authtype 0

May 20 22:27:04.010365 mask 255.255.255.252, hello_ivl 10, opts 0x12, prio 128
May 20 22:27:04.010387 dead_ivl 40, DR 192.168.0.2, BDR 0.0.0.0
May 20 22:27:07.891698 OSPF periodic xmit from 192.168.0.1 to 224.0.0.5 (IFL 2684276180 area
0.0.0.0)
May 20 22:27:12.749988 OSPF packet ignored: area mismatch (0.0.0.1) from 192.168.0.2 on intf
ge-1/1/2.0 area 0.0.0.0
May 20 22:27:12.750071 OSPF rcvd Hello 192.168.0.2 -> 224.0.0.5 (ge-1/1/2.0 IFL 343 area
0.0.0.0)
May 20 22:27:12.750095 Version 2, length 44, ID 10.10.10.1, area 0.0.0.1
May 20 22:27:12.750116 checksum 0x166d, authtype 0
May 20 22:27:12.750139 mask 255.255.255.252, hello_ivl 10, opts 0x12, prio 128
May 20 22:27:12.750161 dead_ivl 40, DR 192.168.0.2, BDR 0.0.0.0
May 20 22:27:14.393182 OSPF rcvd Hello 192.168.0.2 -> 224.0.0.5 (ge-1/1/2.0 IFL 343 area
0.0.0.0)
May 20 22:27:14.393262 Version 2, length 44, ID 10.10.10.1, area 0.0.0.0
May 20 22:27:14.393284 checksum 0x0, authtype 0
May 20 22:27:14.393307 mask 255.255.255.252, hello_ivl 50, opts 0x12, prio 128
May 20 22:27:14.393368 dead_ivl 200, DR 0.0.0.0, BDR 0.0.0.0
May 20 22:27:14.393399 OSPF packet ignored: our router ID received from 192.168.0.2 on intf
ge-1/1/2.0 area 0.0.0.0
— Exhibit —
Referring to the exhibit, which two OSPF adjacency problems are present? (Choose two.)

Click the Exhibit button.
— Exhibit —
May 20 22:27:04.010297 OSPF rcvd Hello 192.168.0.2 -> 224.0.0.5 (ge-1/1/2.0 IFL 343 area
0.0.0.0)
May 20 22:27:04.010320 Version 2, length 44, ID 10.10.10.1, area 0.0.0.1
May 20 22:27:04.010342 checksum 0x166d, authtype 0

May 20 22:27:04.010365 mask 255.255.255.252, hello_ivl 10, opts 0x12, prio 128
May 20 22:27:04.010387 dead_ivl 40, DR 192.168.0.2, BDR 0.0.0.0
May 20 22:27:07.891698 OSPF periodic xmit from 192.168.0.1 to 224.0.0.5 (IFL 2684276180 area
0.0.0.0)
May 20 22:27:12.749988 OSPF packet ignored: area mismatch (0.0.0.1) from 192.168.0.2 on intf
ge-1/1/2.0 area 0.0.0.0
May 20 22:27:12.750071 OSPF rcvd Hello 192.168.0.2 -> 224.0.0.5 (ge-1/1/2.0 IFL 343 area
0.0.0.0)
May 20 22:27:12.750095 Version 2, length 44, ID 10.10.10.1, area 0.0.0.1
May 20 22:27:12.750116 checksum 0x166d, authtype 0
May 20 22:27:12.750139 mask 255.255.255.252, hello_ivl 10, opts 0x12, prio 128
May 20 22:27:12.750161 dead_ivl 40, DR 192.168.0.2, BDR 0.0.0.0
May 20 22:27:14.393182 OSPF rcvd Hello 192.168.0.2 -> 224.0.0.5 (ge-1/1/2.0 IFL 343 area
0.0.0.0)
May 20 22:27:14.393262 Version 2, length 44, ID 10.10.10.1, area 0.0.0.0
May 20 22:27:14.393284 checksum 0x0, authtype 0
May 20 22:27:14.393307 mask 255.255.255.252, hello_ivl 50, opts 0x12, prio 128
May 20 22:27:14.393368 dead_ivl 200, DR 0.0.0.0, BDR 0.0.0.0
May 20 22:27:14.393399 OSPF packet ignored: our router ID received from 192.168.0.2 on intf
ge-1/1/2.0 area 0.0.0.0
— Exhibit —
Referring to the exhibit, which two OSPF adjacency problems are present? (Choose two.)

A.
hello interval mismatch

B.
duplicate router ID

C.
area type mismatch

D.
area number mismatch

Explanation:



Leave a Reply 0

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *