which configuration was used to load-balance traffic across xe-5/2/0 and xe-5/2/1 interfaces?

Refer to the Exhibit.
user@router> show route 100.1.1.0
inet.0: 17 destinations, 19 routes (16 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden)
+ = Active Route, – = Last Active, * = Both
100.1.1.0/24 *[BGP/170] 00:08:51, localpref 100
AS path: 65000 I
to 17.3.1.4 via xe-5/2/0.0
> to 17.1.1.1 via xe-5/2/1.0
[BGP/170] 00:08:51, localpref 100
AS path: 65000 I
> to 17.3.1.4 via xe-5/2/0.0
Referring to the exhibit, which configuration was used to load-balance traffic across xe-5/2/0 and
xe-5/2/1 interfaces?

Refer to the Exhibit.
user@router> show route 100.1.1.0
inet.0: 17 destinations, 19 routes (16 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden)
+ = Active Route, – = Last Active, * = Both
100.1.1.0/24 *[BGP/170] 00:08:51, localpref 100
AS path: 65000 I
to 17.3.1.4 via xe-5/2/0.0
> to 17.1.1.1 via xe-5/2/1.0
[BGP/170] 00:08:51, localpref 100
AS path: 65000 I
> to 17.3.1.4 via xe-5/2/0.0
Referring to the exhibit, which configuration was used to load-balance traffic across xe-5/2/0 and
xe-5/2/1 interfaces?

A.
set protocols bgp group CUST multipath

B.
set protocols bgp group CUST advertise-inactive

C.
set protocols bgp group CUST metric-out igp

D.
set protocols bgp group CUST multihop

Explanation:



Leave a Reply 0

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *