Which two changes must you implement to resolve the problem?

Refer to the Exhibit.
— Exhibit –[edit]
user@router# show protocols bgp
group myEBGP {
import noTransit;
peer-as 318;
neighbor ;
}
[edit]

user@router# show policy-options
policy-statement noTransit {
term rejectAS1524 {
from as-path AS1524;
then accept;
}
}
as-path AS1524 *1524*;
— Exhibit —
To block transit traffic from AS1524, you have configured and committed the configuration as
shown in the exhibit. However, traffic from AS1524 is still flowing through your AS.
Which two changes must you implement to resolve the problem? (Choose two.)

Refer to the Exhibit.
— Exhibit –[edit]
user@router# show protocols bgp
group myEBGP {
import noTransit;
peer-as 318;
neighbor ;
}
[edit]

user@router# show policy-options
policy-statement noTransit {
term rejectAS1524 {
from as-path AS1524;
then accept;
}
}
as-path AS1524 *1524*;
— Exhibit —
To block transit traffic from AS1524, you have configured and committed the configuration as
shown in the exhibit. However, traffic from AS1524 is still flowing through your AS.
Which two changes must you implement to resolve the problem? (Choose two.)

A.
Change the peer AS in the myEBGP group to 1524.

B.
Change the as-path regex to “.* 1524 .*”

C.
Change the then condition from accept to reject.

D.
Change the import noTransit statement to export noTransit.

Explanation:



Leave a Reply 0

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *