what is causing the problem?

Refer to the Exhibit.
— Exhibit –[edit]
user@router# show protocols bgp
group ebgp {
import block-martian;
family inet {

unicast;
}
peer-as 65530;
neighbor 172.22.135.37;
}
[edit]
user@router# show policy-options
policy-statement block-martian {
term 1 {
from {
route-filter 0.0.0.0/8 orlonger reject;
route-filter 127.0.0.0/8 orlonger reject;
route-filter 191.255.0.0/16 orlonger reject;
route-filter 192.0.0.0/24 orlonger reject;
route-filter 223.255.255.0/24 orlonger reject;
route-filter 240.0.0.0/4 orlonger reject;
}
}
then reject;
}
[edit]


You have established a peering with an EBGP neighbor, but the peer’s 172.0.0.0/8 routes show as
hidden.
Referring to the exhibit, what is causing the problem?

Refer to the Exhibit.
— Exhibit –[edit]
user@router# show protocols bgp
group ebgp {
import block-martian;
family inet {

unicast;
}
peer-as 65530;
neighbor 172.22.135.37;
}
[edit]
user@router# show policy-options
policy-statement block-martian {
term 1 {
from {
route-filter 0.0.0.0/8 orlonger reject;
route-filter 127.0.0.0/8 orlonger reject;
route-filter 191.255.0.0/16 orlonger reject;
route-filter 192.0.0.0/24 orlonger reject;
route-filter 223.255.255.0/24 orlonger reject;
route-filter 240.0.0.0/4 orlonger reject;
}
}
then reject;
}
[edit]


You have established a peering with an EBGP neighbor, but the peer’s 172.0.0.0/8 routes show as
hidden.
Referring to the exhibit, what is causing the problem?

A.
The ebgp group configuration is missing an export policy needed to accept the routes.

B.
The route-filter used in the import policy is rejecting the 172.0.0.0/8 routes.

C.
The import policy is rejecting all routes from the EBGP peer.

D.
The ebgp group configuration for family inet unicast is causing a route mismatch.

Explanation:



Leave a Reply 0

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *