What is the problem?

Refer to the Exhibit.
— Exhibit –user@P1# show policy-options policy-statement imp-bgp1 term 1 {
from {
protocol bgp;
route-filter 0.0.0.0/0 orlonger;
}
then {
preference 245;
}
}
user@P1# show protocols bgp group IBGP
local-address 172.24.255.1;
family inet {

unicast;
}
family inet-vpn {
unicast;
}
cluster 172.24.255.1;
peer-as 50;
neighbor 172.24.255.3;
neighbor 172.24.255.2 {
local-preference 200;
import imp-bgp1;
}
neighbor 172.24.255.4;
— Exhibit —
The operator of the network shown in the exhibit wants to make 172.24.255.2 the preferred path
for routes. However, the router still prefers a different peer.
What is the problem?

Refer to the Exhibit.
— Exhibit –user@P1# show policy-options policy-statement imp-bgp1 term 1 {
from {
protocol bgp;
route-filter 0.0.0.0/0 orlonger;
}
then {
preference 245;
}
}
user@P1# show protocols bgp group IBGP
local-address 172.24.255.1;
family inet {

unicast;
}
family inet-vpn {
unicast;
}
cluster 172.24.255.1;
peer-as 50;
neighbor 172.24.255.3;
neighbor 172.24.255.2 {
local-preference 200;
import imp-bgp1;
}
neighbor 172.24.255.4;
— Exhibit —
The operator of the network shown in the exhibit wants to make 172.24.255.2 the preferred path
for routes. However, the router still prefers a different peer.
What is the problem?

A.
The default protocol preference is less preferred than the preference set in the policy.

B.
The import policy is setting the protocol preference less preferred than the default.

C.
The default protocol preference is more preferred than the preference set in the policy.

D.
The local preference setting is below the default.

Explanation:



Leave a Reply 1

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


dev-null

dev-null

I cannot get the clue what is the difference between B and C. Both of them sates the same thing, isn’t it ?