— Exhibit —
user@router# run show log ospf-test
…
Jun 10 22:35:38.598494 OSPF sent Hello 10.100.0.1 -> 224.0.0.5 (ge-1/0/3.1000 IFL 77 area
0.0.0.0)
Jun 10 22:35:38.598520 Version 2, length 44, ID 10.100.1.2, area 0.0.0.0
Jun 10 22:35:38.598543 mask 255.255.255.252, hello_ivl 10, opts 0x2, prio 128
Jun 10 22:35:38.598564 dead_ivl 32, DR 10.100.0.1, BDR 0.0.0.0
Jun 10 22:35:41.522956 OSPF periodic xmit from 10.200.26.1 to 224.0.0.5 (IFL 2684276196 area
0.0.0.1)
Jun 10 22:35:42.798220 OSPF rcvd Hello 10.100.0.2 -> 224.0.0.5 (ge-1/0/3.1000 IFL 77 area
0.0.0.0)
Jun 10 22:35:42.798311 Version 2, length 48, ID 10.100.1.1, area 0.0.0.0
Jun 10 22:35:42.798334 checksum 0x0, authtype 0
Jun 10 22:35:42.798356 mask 255.255.255.252, hello_ivl 10, opts 0x2, prio 128
Jun 10 22:35:42.798377 dead_ivl 40, DR 10.100.0.2, BDR 10.100.0.1
Jun 10 22:35:45.189034 OSPF rcvd Hello 10.100.0.2 -> 224.0.0.5 (ge-1/0/3.1000 IFL 77 area
0.0.0.0)
Jun 10 22:35:45.189097 Version 2, length 44, ID 10.100.1.1, area 0.0.0.0
Jun 10 22:35:45.189118 checksum 0x0, authtype 0
Jun 10 22:35:45.189140 mask 255.255.255.252, hello_ivl 10, opts 0x2, prio 128
Jun 10 22:35:45.189162 dead_ivl 40, DR 10.100.0.2, BDR 0.0.0.0
Jun 10 22:35:45.196969 OSPF DR is 10.100.1.2, BDR is 0.0.0.0
Jun 10 22:35:45.197050 OSPF sent Hello 10.200.26.1 -> 224.0.0.5 (ge-1/0/0.0 IFL 69 area
0.0.0.1)
Jun 10 22:35:45.197076 Version 2, length 44, ID 10.100.1.2, area 0.0.0.1
Jun 10 22:35:45.197098 mask 255.255.255.252, hello_ivl 10, opts 0x2, prio 128
Jun 10 22:35:45.197119 dead_ivl 40, DR 10.200.26.1, BDR 0.0.0.0
Jun 10 22:35:46.746900 OSPF periodic xmit from 10.100.0.1 to 224.0.0.5 (IFL 2684276196 area
0.0.0.0)
— Exhibit —
Refer to the Exhibit.
Referring to the exhibit, what is preventing the OSPF neighborship with two directly connected
routers using interface ge-1/0/3 from reaching the full state?
A.
dead interval mismatch
B.
authentication type mismatch
C.
subnet mismatch
D.
hello interval mismatch
Explanation: