Why do you think this could be a bad idea if there is an Intrusion Detection System deployed to monitor the traffic between point A and B?

SSL has been seen as the solution to a lot of common security problems. Administrator will often
time make use of SSL to encrypt communications from points A to point B. Why do you think this
could be a bad idea if there is an Intrusion Detection System deployed to monitor the traffic
between point A and B?

SSL has been seen as the solution to a lot of common security problems. Administrator will often
time make use of SSL to encrypt communications from points A to point B. Why do you think this
could be a bad idea if there is an Intrusion Detection System deployed to monitor the traffic
between point A and B?

A.
SSL is redundant if you already have IDS’s in place

B.
SSL will trigger rules at regular interval and force the administrator to turn them off

C.
SSL will slow down the IDS while it is breaking the encryption to see the packet content

D.
SSL will blind the content of the packet and Intrusion Detection Systems will not be able to
detect them



Leave a Reply 1

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


David

David

I think c is correct answer