Which dependent object will get invalidated even if it is not affected by the table redefinition?

Which dependent object will get invalidated even if it is not affected by the table redefinition?

A.
packages

B.
triggers

C.
synonyms

D.
views

Explanation:
Results of the Redefinition Process
The following are the end results of the redefinition process:
The original table is redefined with the columns, indexes, constraints, grants, triggers, and
statistics of the interim table.
Dependent objects that were registered, either explicitly using
REGISTER_DEPENDENT_OBJECT or implicitly using COPY_TABLE_DEPENDENTS, are
renamed automatically so that dependent object names on the redefined table are the same
as before redefinition.
Note:
If no registration is done or no automatic copying is done, then you must manually rename
the dependent objects.
The referential constraints involving the interim table now involve the redefined table and are
enabled.
Any indexes, triggers, materialized view logs, grants, and constraints defined on the original
table (prior to redefinition) are transferred to the interim table and are dropped when the user
drops the interim table. Any referential constraints involving the original table before the
redefinition now involve the interim table and are disabled.
Some PL/SQL objects, views, synonyms, and other table-dependent objects may become
invalidated. Only those objects that depend on elements of the table that were changed are
invalidated. For example, if a PL/SQL procedure queries only columns of the redefined table
that were unchanged by the redefinition, the procedure remains valid. See “Managing Object
Dependencies” for more information about schema object dependencies.