which strategy allows the tag handler for n:recurse to output the nesting depth of the deepest n:recurse tag?

Given a JSP page:

The tag handler for n:recurse extends SimpleTagSupport.Assuming an n:recurse tag can either
contain an empty body or another n:recurse tag, which strategy allows the tag handler for
n:recurse to output the nesting depth of the deepest n:recurse tag?

Given a JSP page:

The tag handler for n:recurse extends SimpleTagSupport.Assuming an n:recurse tag can either
contain an empty body or another n:recurse tag, which strategy allows the tag handler for
n:recurse to output the nesting depth of the deepest n:recurse tag?

A.
It is impossible to determine the deepest nesting depth because it is impossible for tag handlers
that extend SimpleTagSupport to communicate with their parent and child tags.

B.
Create a private non-static attribute in the tag handler class called count of type int initialized to
0. Increment count in the doTag method. If the tag has a body, invoke the fragment for that body.
Otherwise, output the value of count.

C.
Start a counter at 1. Call getChildTags(). If it returns null, output the value of the counter.
Otherwise, increment counter and continue from where getChildTags() is called. Skip processing
of the body.

D.
If the tag has a body, invoke the fragment for that body.Otherwise, start a counter at 1.
Call getParent(). If it returns null, output the value of the counter Otherwise, increment the counter
and continue from where getParent() is called.

Explanation:



Leave a Reply 0

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *