Which three actions would you recommend to reduce the overheads?

You have a four-node cluster with instances RDBD1, RDBD2, RDBD3, and RDBD4. While
evaluating statspack reports, you find nq: TX- index contention on page one under the category op
5 Timed Events.
Further study finds an unusually high number of c buffer busy waits in the Wait Events section.
Checking the Instance Activity Stats section, you see an unusually high value for eaf Node Splits.
Using v$segment_statistics, you identify that the top segment with c buffer busy waits is the index
prooducts_pk, which obtains the primary key from a sequence. You wish to present alternative
solutions to the team to help reduce contention.
Which three actions would you recommend to reduce the overheads? (Choose three.

You have a four-node cluster with instances RDBD1, RDBD2, RDBD3, and RDBD4. While
evaluating statspack reports, you find nq: TX- index contention on page one under the category op
5 Timed Events.
Further study finds an unusually high number of c buffer busy waits in the Wait Events section.
Checking the Instance Activity Stats section, you see an unusually high value for eaf Node Splits.
Using v$segment_statistics, you identify that the top segment with c buffer busy waits is the index
prooducts_pk, which obtains the primary key from a sequence. You wish to present alternative
solutions to the team to help reduce contention.
Which three actions would you recommend to reduce the overheads? (Choose three.

A.
Encourage shorter transactions.

B.
Set _lm_msg_batch_size to a higher value.

C.
Set fast_start_mttr_target to a higher value.

D.
Re-create the index as a global hash partitioned index.

E.
Increase the sequence cache size if retaining the sequence.

F.
Re-create the table using a natural key instead of a surrogate key.



Leave a Reply 0

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *