Which two are advantages of using WLS JMS instead of using a third-party JMS Provider
(Tibco, Sonic, etc.)?
A.
JMS subsystem of WLS shares same JVM as core WLS application server, so application
avoids the overhead of message serialization/de-serialization (necessary when using a 3rd
party JMS provider with WLS)
B.
WLS JMS is always faster than 3rd party JMS providers
C.
Unified operations and management tools across Application Server and JMS Provider
will help with manageability and diagnostics
D.
WLS JMS more compliant with JMS spec than 3rd party vendors