Which configuration would achieve that goal?

You have been asked to propose a multi-region deployment of a web-facing application where a controlled
portion of your traffic is being processed by an alternate region.
Which configuration would achieve that goal?

You have been asked to propose a multi-region deployment of a web-facing application where a controlled
portion of your traffic is being processed by an alternate region.
Which configuration would achieve that goal?

A.
Route53 record sets with weighted routing policy

B.
Route53 record sets with latency based routing policy

C.
Auto Scaling with scheduled scaling actions set

D.
Elastic Load Balancing with health checks enabled

Explanation:

http://docs.aws.amazon.com/ElasticLoadBalancing/latest/DeveloperGuide/TerminologyandKeyConcepts.html



Leave a Reply 0

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Bryan Erwin

Bryan Erwin

I think the best answer would be Route53 using Geo Location, but since that’s not an option in the answer list I would choose A for Route53 Weighted. The answer D doesn’t address any part of the question.

Seth

Seth

As others have said, correct answer is A.

Juan Mesa

Juan Mesa

IMO the answer is B, with weighted routing policy you can’t control what user can or can’t use the webserver in another region.

venkat sai

venkat sai

My friend Juan, I hope you haven’t understood the concept of latency based routing. It depends upon the latency between the two regions to direct the traffic to the region which has least latency. Here, you don’t have control over the traffic that has been originated from the users because you can’t predict the latency. Whereas, weighted policy will help you control the portion of the traffic that has to be directed to the regions.

Chef

Chef

Don’t fight it. The answer is

A.
Route53 record sets with weighted routing policy

It’s a trick question because the key term is controlled. Latency based routing is not controlled.

raj

raj

for a controlled
portion of your traffic is being processed by an alternate region.

A.
Route53 record sets with weighted routing policy

BDA

BDA

A

Weighted Routing Policy
Use the weighted routing policy when you have multiple resources that perform the same function (for example, web servers that serve the same website) and you want Amazon Route 53 to route traffic to those resources in proportions that you specify (for example, one quarter to one server and three quarters to the other). For more information about weighted resource record sets, see Weighted Routing.

Sam T

Sam T

By default it is A.
But they have not defined what is being controlled – geo, latency, preferred customers. That can lead to different answer

Masood

Masood

Latency routing policy – Use when you have resources in multiple locations and you want to route traffic to the resource that provides the best latency.