Does this meet the goal?

Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series
contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one
correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.
After you answer a question in this sections, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will
not appear in the review screen.
You have an In-Place Hold that was implemented by running the following command:
New-MailboxSearch –Name “Hold-ProjectX” –SourceMailboxes “User1”.
You are notified that the In-Place Hold is no longer required.
You need to ensure that the mailbox data can be deleted by using retention policies.
Solution: You run the Set-Mailbox “User1” –LitigationHoldEnabled $false.
Does this meet the goal?

Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series
contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one
correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.
After you answer a question in this sections, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will
not appear in the review screen.
You have an In-Place Hold that was implemented by running the following command:
New-MailboxSearch –Name “Hold-ProjectX” –SourceMailboxes “User1”.
You are notified that the In-Place Hold is no longer required.
You need to ensure that the mailbox data can be deleted by using retention policies.
Solution: You run the Set-Mailbox “User1” –LitigationHoldEnabled $false.
Does this meet the goal?

A.
Yes

B.
No



Leave a Reply 1

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *