What could be the issue?

A customer network engineer has made configuration changes that have resulted in some loss of
connectivity. You have been called in to evaluate a switch network and suggest resolutions to the
problems.

Refer to the topology.
SW1 Switch Management IP address is not pingable from SW4. What could be the issue?

A customer network engineer has made configuration changes that have resulted in some loss of
connectivity. You have been called in to evaluate a switch network and suggest resolutions to the
problems.

Refer to the topology.
SW1 Switch Management IP address is not pingable from SW4. What could be the issue?

A.
Management VLAN not allowed in the trunk links between SW1 and SW4

B.
Management VLAN not allowed in the trunk links between SW1 and SW2

C.
Management VLAN not allowed in the trunk link between SW2 and SW4

D.
Management VLAN ip address on SW4 is configured in wrong subnet

E.
Management VLAN interface is shutdown on SW4

Explanation:
In the network, VLAN 300 is called the Management VLAN. Based on the configurations shown
below, SW1 has VLAN 300 configured with the IP address of 192.168.10.1/24, while on SW4
VLAN 300 has an IP address of 192.168.100.4/24, which is not in the same subnet.



Leave a Reply 15

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Google

Google

Here are some hyperlinks to sites that we link to because we consider they’re really worth visiting.

create an app

create an app

although sites we backlink to below are considerably not related to ours, we really feel they may be truly really worth a go as a result of, so possess a look

Individuelle Wandfliesen

Individuelle Wandfliesen

Here is a good Blog You may Locate Exciting that we Encourage You

work from home jobs with no startup fees

work from home jobs with no startup fees

very few web-sites that come about to become in depth below, from our point of view are undoubtedly nicely worth checking out

app builder

app builder

the time to read or take a look at the content or sites we’ve linked to beneath the

Family Law News

Family Law News

although internet sites we backlink to below are considerably not related to ours, we really feel they are actually worth a go via, so possess a look

recipes

recipes

below you will obtain the link to some websites that we believe you’ll want to visit

email processing system

email processing system

check beneath, are some absolutely unrelated web-sites to ours, having said that, they are most trustworthy sources that we use

casas deportivas

casas deportivas

Here is a good Blog You might Come across Exciting that we Encourage You

Gate Motor

Gate Motor

just beneath, are a lot of totally not associated websites to ours, having said that, they may be surely worth going over

bridesmaid wine glasses uk

bridesmaid wine glasses uk

check below, are some absolutely unrelated sites to ours, having said that, they are most trustworthy sources that we use

wooden phone case

wooden phone case

although web-sites we backlink to beneath are considerably not connected to ours, we feel they’re really worth a go as a result of, so have a look

1500 Thread count Egyptian cotton

1500 Thread count Egyptian cotton

the time to study or check out the subject material or websites we have linked to below the

Car care

Car care

The facts talked about inside the write-up are a number of the most effective out there

Lisa

Lisa

2017/Sep/New 300-135 Exam Questions and Answers:

Ticket 3 : OSPF Authentication
Topology Overview (Actual Troubleshooting lab design is for below network design)
– Client Should have IP 10.2.1.3
– EIGRP 100 is running between switch DSW1 & DSW2
– OSPF (Process ID 1) is running between R1, R2, R3, R4
– Network of OSPF is redistributed in EIGRP
– BGP 65001 is configured on R1 with Webserver cloud AS 65002
– HSRP is running between DSW1 & DSW2 Switches
The company has created the test bed shown in the layer 2 and layer 3 topology exhibits.
This network consists of four routers, two layer 3 switches and two layer 2 switches.
In the IPv4 layer 3 topology, R1, R2, R3, and R4 are running OSPF with an OSPF process number 1.
DSW1, DSW2 and R4 are running EIGRP with an AS of 10. Redistribution is enabled where necessary.
R1 is running a BGP AS with a number of 65001. This AS has an eBGP connection to AS 65002 in the ISP’s network. Because the company’s address space is in the private range.
R1 is also providing NAT translations between the inside (10.1.0.0/16 & 10.2.0.0/16) networks and outside (209.65.0.0/24) network.
ASW1 and ASW2 are layer 2 switches.
NTP is enabled on all devices with 209.65.200.226 serving as the master clock source.
The client workstations receive their IP address and default gateway via R4’s DHCP server.
The default gateway address of 10.2.1.254 is the IP address of HSRP group 10 which is running on DSW1 and DSW2.
In the IPv6 layer 3 topology R1, R2, and R3 are running OSPFv3 with an OSPF process number 6.
DSW1, DSW2 and R4 are running RIPng process name RIP_ZONE.
The two IPv6 routing domains, OSPF 6 and RIPng are connected via GRE tunnel running over the underlying IPv4 OSPF domain. Redistrution is enabled where necessary.
Recently the implementation group has been using the test bed to do a `proof-of-concept’ on several implementations. This involved changing the configuration on one or more of the devices. You will be presented with a series of trouble tickets related to issues introduced during these configurations.
Note: Although trouble tickets have many similar fault indications, each ticket has its own issue and solution.
Each ticket has 3 sub questions that need to be answered & topology remains same.
Question-1 Fault is found on which device,
Question-2 Fault condition is related to,
Question-3 What exact problem is seen & what needs to be done for solution
Client is unable to ping IP 209.65.200.241
Solution:
Steps need to follow as below:
– When we check on client 1 & Client 2 desktop we are not receiving DHCP address from R4 Ipconfig —– Client will be receiving IP address 10.2.1.3
– IP 10.2.1.3 will be able to ping from R4 , R3, R2 but not from R1
image_thumb[13]
– Check for neighborship of ospf
sh ip ospf nei —– Only one neighborship is forming with R2 & i.e. with R3
Since R2 is connected to R1 & R3 with routing protocol ospf than there should be 2 neighbors seen but only one is seen
– Need to check running config of R2 & R3 for interface
Sh run ————————– Interface Serial0/0/0/0.12 on R2
image_thumb[14]
– Sh run ————————– Interface Serial0/0/0/0 on R1
– Change required: On R1, for IPV4 authentication of OSPF command is missing and required to configure—— ip ospf authentication message-digest

QUESTION 47
The implementations group has been using the test bed to do a `proof-of-concept’ that requires both Client 1 and Client 2 to access the WEB Server at 209.65.200.241. After several changes to the network addressing, routing scheme, DHCP services, NTP services, layer 2 connectivity, FHRP services, and device security, a trouble ticket has been opened indicating that Client 1 cannot ping the 209.65.200.241 address.
Use the supported commands to isolated the cause of this fault and answer the following questions.
On which device is the fault condition located?

A. R1
B. R2
C. R3
D. R4
E. DSW1
F. DSW2
G. ASW1
H. ASW2

Answer: A
Explanation:

QUESTION 48
The implementations group has been using the test bed to do a `proof-of-concept’ that requires both Client 1 and Client 2 to access the WEB Server at 209.65.200.241. After several changes to the network addressing, routing scheme, DHCP services, NTP services, layer 2 connectivity, FHRP services, and device security, a trouble ticket has been opened indicating that Client 1 cannot ping the 209.65.200.241 address.
Use the supported commands to isolated the cause of this fault and answer the following questions.
The fault condition is related to which technology?

A. BGP
B. NTP
C. IP NAT
D. IPv4 OSPF Routing
E. IPv4 OSPF Redistribution
F. IPv6 OSPF Routing
G. IPv4 layer 3 security

Answer: D
Explanation:

QUESTION 49
The implementations group has been using the test bed to do a `proof-of-concept’ that requires both Client 1 and Client 2 to access the WEB Server at 209.65.200.241. After several changes to the network addressing, routing scheme, DHCP services, NTP services, layer 2 connectivity, FHRP services, and device security, a trouble ticket has been opened indicating that Client 1 cannot ping the 209.65.200.241 address.
Use the supported commands to isolated the cause of this fault and answer the following questions.
What is the solution to the fault condition?

A. Enable OSPF authentication on the s0/0/0 interface using the ip ospf authentication message-digest command
B. Enable OSPF routing on the s0/0/0 interface using the network 10.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 12 command.
C. Enable OSPF routing on the s0/0/0 interface using the network 209.65.200.0 0.0.0.255 area 12 command.
D. Redistribute the BGP route into OSPF using the redistribute BGP 65001 subnet command.

Answer: A
Explanation:

More new 300-135 Questions: https://www.braindump2go.com/300-135.html (131q)